@article {Durak2016,
	title = {A role for diatom-like silicon transporters in calcifying coccolithophores},
	journal = {Nature Communications},
	volume = {7},
	number = {February},
	year = {2016},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2016,RCC1130,RCC1303,RCC1453,RCC1456,RCC3432},
	pages = {10543},
	abstract = {Biomineralisation by marine phytoplankton, such as the silicifying diatoms and calcifying coccolithophores, plays an important role in carbon and nutrient cycling in the oceans. Silicification and calcification are distinct cellular processes with no known common mechanisms. As a result, it is thought that coccolithophores are able to outcompete diatoms in Si-depleted waters, which can contribute to the formation of coccolithophore blooms. Here, we show that an expanded family of diatom-like silicon transporters (SITs) are present in both silicifying and calcifying haptophyte phytoplankton, including some coccolithophores of global ecological importance. We find an essential role for Si in calcification in these coccolithophores, indicating that Si uptake contributes to the very different forms of biomineralisation in diatoms and coccolithophores. However, SITs and the requirement for Si are significantly absent from the highly abundant bloom-forming coccolithophores, such as Emiliania huxleyi. These very different requirements for Si in coccolithophores are likely to have major influence on their competitive interactions with diatoms and other siliceous phytoplankton.},
	keywords = {(RCC1130, (RCC1456), 2016, biomineralisation, coccolithophores, Gephyrocapsa oceanica (RCC1303) and Scyphosphaera, haptophytes, RCC1130, RCC1303, RCC1453, RCC1456, RCC3432, silica, TMR5 (RCC3432{\textemdash}Sea of Japan) and PZ241 (RCC1453{\textemdash}Med},
	issn = {2041-1723},
	doi = {10.1038/ncomms10543},
	author = {Durak, Grazyna M and Taylor, Alison R and Probert, Ian and de Vargas, Colomban and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Schroeder, Declan C and Brownlee, Colin and Wheeler, Glen L}
}
@article {Decelle2015,
	title = {PhytoREF: a reference database of the plastidial 16S rRNA gene of photosynthetic eukaryotes with curated taxonomy},
	journal = {Molecular Ecology Resources},
	volume = {15},
	number = {6},
	year = {2015},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2015,macumba,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo,sbr?hyto?ppo},
	pages = {1435{\textendash}1445},
	abstract = {Photosynthetic eukaryotes have a critical role as the main producers in most ecosystems of the biosphere. The ongo- ing environmental metabarcoding revolution opens the perspective for holistic ecosystems biological studies of these organisms, in particular the unicellular microalgae that often lack distinctive morphological characters and have complex life cycles. To interpret environmental sequences, metabarcoding necessarily relies on taxonomically curated databases containing reference sequences of the targeted gene (or barcode) from identified organisms. To date, no such reference framework exists for photosynthetic eukaryotes. In this study, we built the PhytoREF data- base that contains 6490 plastidial 16S rDNA reference sequences that originate from a large diversity of eukaryotes representing all known major photosynthetic lineages. We compiled 3333 amplicon sequences available from public databases and 879 sequences extracted from plastidial genomes, and generated 411 novel sequences from cultured marine microalgal strains belonging to different eukaryotic lineages. A total of 1867 environmental Sanger 16S rDNA sequences were also included in the database. Stringent quality filtering and a phylogeny-based taxonomic classifica- tion were applied for each 16S rDNA sequence. The database mainly focuses on marine microalgae, but sequences from land plants (representing half of the PhytoREF sequences) and freshwater taxa were also included to broaden the applicability of PhytoREF to different aquatic and terrestrial habitats. PhytoREF, accessible via a web interface (http://phytoref.fr), is a new resource in molecular ecology to foster the discovery, assessment and monitoring of the diversity of photosynthetic eukaryotes using high-throughput sequencing.},
	keywords = {2015, MACUMBA, rcc, RCC?o?dd, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$IPO, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo, sbr?hyto?ppo},
	issn = {1755098X},
	doi = {10.1111/1755-0998.12401},
	url = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1755-0998.12401},
	author = {Decelle, Johan and Romac, Sarah and Stern, Rowena F. and Bendif, El Mahdi and Zingone, Adriana and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Guiry, Michael D. and Guillou, Laure and Tessier, D{\'e}sir{\'e} and Le Gall, Florence and Gourvil, Priscillia and dos Santos, Adriana Lopes and Probert, Ian and Vaulot, Daniel and de Vargas, Colomban and Christen, Richard}
}
@article {Chambouvet2014,
	title = {Diverse molecular signatures for ribosomally {\textquoteright}active{\textquoteright} Perkinsea in marine sediments},
	journal = {BMC Microbiology},
	volume = {14},
	number = {1},
	year = {2014},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2014,rcc,sbr?hyto?ppo},
	pages = {110},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND:Perkinsea are a parasitic lineage within the eukaryotic superphylum Alveolata. Recent studies making use of environmental small sub-unit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rDNA) sequencing methodologies have detected a significant diversity and abundance of Perkinsea-like phylotypes in freshwater environments. In contrast only a few Perkinsea environmental sequences have been retrieved from marine samples. Only two groups of Perkinsea have been cultured and morphologically described and these are parasites of marine molluscs or marine protists. These two marine groups form separate and distantly related phylogenetic clusters, composed of closely related lineages on SSU rDNA trees. Here, we test the hypothesis that Perkinsea are a hitherto under-sampled group in marine environments. Using 454 diversity {\textquoteright}tag{\textquoteright} sequencing we investigate the diversity and distribution of these protists in marine sediments and water column samples taken from the Deep Chlorophyll Maximum (DCM) and sub-surface using both DNA and RNA as the source template and sampling four European offshore locations.RESULTS:We detected the presence of 265 sequences branching with known Perkinsea, the majority of them recovered from marine sediments. Moreover, 27\% of these sequences were sampled from RNA derived cDNA libraries. Phylogenetic analyses classify a large proportion of these sequences into 38 cluster groups (including 30 novel marine cluster groups), which share less than 97\% sequence similarity as to suggest this diversity encompasses a range of biologically and ecologically distinct organisms.CONCLUSIONS:These results demonstrate that the Perkinsea lineage is considerably more diverse than previously detected in marine environments. This wide diversity of Perkinsea-like protists is largely retrieved in marine sediment with a significant proportion detected in RNA derived libraries suggesting this diversity represents ribosomally {\textquoteright}active{\textquoteright} and intact cells. Given the phylogenetic range of hosts infected by known Perkinsea parasites, these data suggest that Perkinsea either play a significant but hitherto unrecognized role as parasites in marine sediments and/or members of this group are present in the marine sediment possibly as part of the {\textquoteright}seed bank{\textquoteright} microbial community.},
	keywords = {2014, Biomarks, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto?ppo},
	doi = {10.1186/1471-2180-14-110},
	url = {http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/14/110},
	author = {Chambouvet, Aurelie and Berney, Cedric and Romac, Sarah and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Maguire, Finlay and de Vargas, Colomban and Richards, Thomas}
}
@article {Guillou2013,
	title = {The protist ribosomal reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small SubUnit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Research},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2013},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2013,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo,sbr?hyto?ppo},
	pages = {D597{\textendash}D604},
	keywords = {2013, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo, sbr?hyto?ppo},
	doi = {10.1093/nar/gks1160},
	author = {Guillou, Laure and Bachar, Dipankar and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Bass, David and Berney, Cedric and Bittner, Lucie and Boutte, Christophe and Burgaud, Gaetan and de Vargas, Colomban and Decelle, Johan and del Campo, Javier and Dolan, John and Dunthorn, Micah and Bente, Edvardsen and Holzmann, Maria and Kooistra, Wiebe H C F and Lara, Enrique and Lebescot, Noan and Logares, Ramiro and Mah{\'e}, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Massana, Ramon and Montresor, Marina and Morard, Raphael and Not, Fabrice and Pawlowski, Jan and Probert, Ian and Sauvadet, Anne-Laure and Siano, Raffaele and Stoeck, Thorsten and Vaulot, Daniel and Zimmermann, Pascal and Christen, Richard}
}
@article {VonDassow2009,
	title = {Transcriptome analysis of functional differentiation between haploid and diploid cells of Emiliania huxleyi, a globally significant photosynthetic calcifying cell},
	journal = {Genome Biology},
	volume = {10},
	number = {10},
	year = {2009},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2009,rcc,rcc1216,rcc1217,sbr?hyto?ppo},
	pages = {R114},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND:Eukaryotes are classified as either haplontic, diplontic, or haplo-diplontic, depending on which ploidy levels undergo mitotic cell division in the life cycle. Emiliania huxleyi is one of the most abundant phytoplankton species in the ocean, playing an important role in global carbon fluxes, and represents haptophytes, an enigmatic group of unicellular organisms that diverged early in eukaryotic evolution. This species is haplo-diplontic. Little is known about the haploid cells, but they have been hypothesized to allow persistence of the species between the yearly blooms of diploid cells. We sequenced over 38000 Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from haploid and diploid E. huxleyi normalized cDNA libraries to identify genes involved in important processes specific to each life phase (2N calcification or 1N motility), and to better understand the haploid phase of this prominent haplo-diplontic organism.RESULTS:The haploid and diploid transcriptomes showed a dramatic differentiation, with [almost equal to]20\% greater transcriptome richness in diploid cells than in haploid cells and only [less than or equal to]50\% of transcripts estimated to be common between the two phases. The major functional category of transcripts differentiating haploids included signal transduction and motility genes. Diploid-specific transcripts included Ca2+, H+, and HCO3- pumps. Potential factors differentiating the transcriptomes included haploid-specific Myb transcription factor homologs and an unusual diploid-specific histone H4 homolog.CONCLUSIONS:This study permitted the identification of genes likely involved in diploid-specific biomineralization, haploid-specific motility, and transcriptional control. Greater transcriptome richness in diploid cells suggests they may be more versatile for exploiting a diversity of rich environments whereas haploid cells are intrinsically more streamlined.},
	keywords = {2009, rcc, RCC1216, rcc1217, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto?ppo},
	doi = {10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r114},
	url = {http://genomebiology.com/2009/10/10/R114},
	author = {von Dassow, Peter and Ogata, Hiroyuki and Probert, Ian and Wincker, Patrick and Da Silva, Corinne and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Claverie, Jean-Michel and de Vargas, Colomban}
}
