@article {mertens_morpho-molecular_2023,
	title = {Morpho-molecular analysis of podolampadacean dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae), with the description of two new genera},
	journal = {Phycologia},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Publisher: Taylor \& Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2022.2158281},
	month = {feb},
	pages = {1{\textendash}19},
	abstract = {Sequences were obtained for 58 podolampadacean single cells from France, Reunion Island (French territories) and Japan (6 SSU rDNA only, 40 SSU+LSU and 12 LSU only). The sequenced taxa belong to five of the eight described genera: Podolampas, Blepharocysta, Lissodinium, Gaarderiella and Mysticella. Two new genera, Alatosphaera and Pseudalatosphaera, were erected to accommodate {\textquoteleft}Blepharocysta{\textquoteright} hermosillae and {\textquoteleft}Blepharocysta{\textquoteright} denticulata. Most genera are well supported by concatenated LSU{\textendash}SSU rDNA phylogenies, with the least support for Lissodinium. Metabarcoding of podolampadaceans using the V4 region of SSU rDNA showed a resolution too low to discriminate genera or species. Roscoffia and Cabra are here considered podolampadaceans, whilst Lessardia is considered to belong in a separate family. The relationship of Rhinodinium to the Podolampadaceae needs further study. Desmoschisis was recorded for the first time in Alatosphaera and Pseudalatosphaera. Several ribotypes need further study to attribute a species name to them.},
	keywords = {Alatosphaera, Blepharocysta, desmoschisis, Gaarderiella, Lissodinium, LSU rDNA, Mysticella, Podolampas, Pseudalatosphaera, SSU rDNA},
	issn = {0031-8884},
	doi = {10.1080/00318884.2022.2158281},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2022.2158281},
	author = {Mertens, Kenneth Neil and Carbonell-Moore, M. Consuelo and Chom{\'e}rat, Nicolas and Bilien, Gwenael and Boulben, Sylviane and Guillou, Laure and Romac, Sarah and Probert, Ian and Ishikawa, Akira and N{\'e}zan, Elisabeth}
}
@article {Bendif2015,
	title = {Morphological and phylogenetic characterization of new gephyrocapsa isolates suggests introgressive hybridization in the Emiliania/Gephyrocapsa complex (haptophyta)},
	journal = {Protist},
	volume = {166},
	number = {3},
	year = {2015},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2015,RCC1281,RCC1282,RCC1284,RCC1286,RCC1292,RCC1300,RCC1305,RCC1307,RCC1316,RCC1317,RCC1318,RCC1319,RCC1320,RCC1562,RCC1839,RCC3370,RCC3862,RCC3898,rcc},
	pages = {323{\textendash}336},
	abstract = {The coccolithophore genus Gephyrocapsa contains a cosmopolitan assemblage of pelagic species, including the bloom-forming Gephyrocapsa oceanica, and is closely related to the emblematic coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi within the No{\"e}laerhabdaceae. These two species have been extensively studied and are well represented in culture collections, whereas cultures of other species of this family are lacking. We report on three new strains of Gephyrocapsa isolated into culture from samples from the Chilean coastal upwelling zone using a novel flow cytometric single-cell sorting technique. The strains were characterized by morphological analysis using scanning electron microscopy and phylogenetic analysis of 6 genes (nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA, plastidial 16S and tufA, and mitochondrial cox1 and cox3 genes). Morphometric features of the coccoliths indicate that these isolates are distinct from G. oceanica and best correspond to G. muellerae. Surprisingly, both plastidial and mitochondrial gene phylogenies placed these strains within the E. huxleyi clade and well separated from G. oceanica isolates, making Emiliania appear polyphyletic. The only nuclear sequence difference, 1bp in the 28S rDNA region, also grouped E. huxleyi with the new Gephyrocapsa isolates and apart from G. oceanica. Specifically, the G. muellerae morphotype strains clustered with the mitochondrial β clade of E. huxleyi, which, like G. muellerae, has been associated with cold (temperate and sub-polar) waters. Among putative evolutionary scenarios that could explain these results we discuss the possibility that E. huxleyi is not a valid taxonomic unit, or, alternatively the possibility of past hybridization and introgression between each E. huxleyi clade and older Gephyrocapsa clades. In either case, the results support the transfer of Emiliania to Gephyrocapsa. These results have important implications for relating morphological species concepts to ecological and evolutionary units of diversity.},
	keywords = {2015, coccolithophores, Emiliania huxleyi, Gephyrocapsa muellerae, Gephyrocapsa oceanica, hybridization, phylogeny., rcc, RCC1281, RCC1282, RCC1284, RCC1286, RCC1292, RCC1300, RCC1305, RCC1307, RCC1316, RCC1317, RCC1318, RCC1319, RCC1320, RCC1562, RCC1839, RCC3370, RCC3862, RCC3898, species concept},
	issn = {14344610},
	doi = {10.1016/j.protis.2015.05.003},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461015000243},
	author = {Bendif, El Mahdi and Probert, Ian and Young, Jeremy R. and von Dassow, Peter}
}
