@article {Stettin2020,
	title = {Metabolomics benefits from orbitrap GC{\textendash}MS{\textemdash}Comparison of low- and high-resolution GC{\textendash}MS},
	journal = {Metabolites},
	volume = {10},
	number = {4},
	year = {2020},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: RCC75},
	month = {apr},
	pages = {143},
	abstract = {The development of improved mass spectrometers and supporting computational tools is expected to enable the rapid annotation of whole metabolomes. Essential for the progress is the identification of strengths and weaknesses of novel instrumentation in direct comparison to previous instruments. Orbitrap liquid chromatography (LC){\textendash}mass spectrometry (MS) technology is now widely in use, while Orbitrap gas chromatography (GC){\textendash}MS introduced in 2015 has remained fairly unexplored in its potential for metabolomics research. This study aims to evaluate the additional knowledge gained in a metabolomics experiment when using the high-resolution Orbitrap GC{\textendash}MS in comparison to a commonly used unit-mass resolution single-quadrupole GC{\textendash}MS. Samples from an osmotic stress treatment of a non-model organism, the microalga Skeletonema costatum, were investigated using comparative metabolomics with low- and high-resolution methods. Resulting datasets were compared on a statistical level and on the level of individual compound annotation. Both MS approaches resulted in successful classification of stressed vs. non-stressed microalgae but did so using different sets of significantly dysregulated metabolites. High-resolution data only slightly improved conventional library matching but enabled the correct annotation of an unknown. While computational support that utilizes high-resolution GC{\textendash}MS data is still underdeveloped, clear benefits in terms of sensitivity, metabolic coverage, and support in structure elucidation of the Orbitrap GC{\textendash}MS technology for metabolomics studies are shown here.},
	keywords = {Comparative metabolomics, Diatom, High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), Instrument comparison, Mass Spectrometry (Orbitrap GC-MS), Metabolite identification, Orbitrap Gas Chromatography, Osmotic stress, RCC75},
	issn = {2218-1989},
	doi = {10.3390/metabo10040143},
	url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/4/143},
	author = {Stettin, Daniel and Poulin, Remington X. and Pohnert, Georg}
}
